Paragard Copper IUD Lawsuits Transferred to Female Judge in Georgia

Paragard copper IUD lawsuits filed by women from 23 states were grouped together and transferred to federal court in Atlanta late last year, where they will be heard by U.S. District Judge Leigh Martin May in the District of Northern Georgia. The transfer order applies to 55 Paragard lawsuits originally filed across 31 federal districts.

Currently, more than 80 Paragard lawsuits are pending in more than 36 federal districts. Additional Paragard lawsuits may be included at a later date.

The decision to consolidate the Paragard lawsuits was made in December by the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Legislation, which decides whether and where to consolidate related federal lawsuits in a single district — which is called multidistrict litigation. The panel features seven federal judges and is informally known as the “MDL Panel.”

The lawsuits allege that Paragard IUD (intrauterine device) can break during removal, leading to complications and injuries such as infertility and pain, and sometimes requiring surgeries to remove broken-off pieces left behind in the body. Together, the lawsuits raise questions about Paragard’s development, manufacturing, testing, labeling, and marketing, according to the MDL Panel.

Paragard manufacturer Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. opposed centralization of the Paragard lawsuits. The written response was submitted jointly by Teva Pharmaceuticals USA along with sister and parent companies Teva Women’s Health, Inc., Teva Women’s Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc., The Cooper Companies, Inc., and CooperSurgical, Inc.

Grouping related individual lawsuits together is more efficient and cost-effective for the federal court system. Consolidation also typically makes the lawsuit process easier for ordinary citizens filing lawsuits against large companies with typically much greater resources.

In December, Atlanta attorney Robert Hammers urged the MDL panel to transfer the Paragard lawsuits to Judge May, in part because of her gender. Hammers represents women who allege injury from Paragard.

“We believe that she’s the best judge to get this of all (the judges) proposed because she’s a woman and this is a woman’s product dealing with women’s issues,” Hammers told the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Legislation.

Paragard IUD (intrauterine device) is the only nonhormonal IUD of the five IUDs currently available in the United States. Paragard relies on biochemical reactions from copper in the device to prevent pregnancy.

By Carah Wertheimer

Carah Wertheimer is an editor and reporter based in Boulder, Colorado. Her areas of specialization include food, health, environment, social justice and community reporting. Her work has appeared in National Geographic, The Denver Post, The Daily Beast, the Boulder Daily Camera, Boulder Weekly and other publications.




MedTruth is a digital magazine reporting on health, safety and justice. Join the revolution today at

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

Embracing Asymmetry

Read This Before You Fly Anywhere

Opioid Addiction is the Cancer of Our Generation

5 Home Remedies for eczema that will surprise you!

In a world of infection control, we need to talk more about sex: why condoms and other health…

Pierre McCarragher has joined the community

What I’m Doing During COVID-19

Should I get a Covid-19 booster shot? Views from a teacher trying to do the right thing

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store


MedTruth is a digital magazine reporting on health, safety and justice. Join the revolution today at

More from Medium

Deconstructing Props

Challenges in Reforming High Schools

Bags and Bottles

2021 End of Year Summary