Medical Research Peer Review Process: What You Need to Know

Every legitimate medical journal has a peer review board hired by the journal to evaluate whether studies submitted for publication meet the journal’s standards.

Peer review boards look closely for issues such as:

  • reliance on outdated or disproved scientific or analytic methods
  • questionable interpretations of data used to make unsubstantiated conclusions
  • potential ethical conflicts of interest on the part of the scientists that could affect the validity of the results

Peer Review Process

Peer review can take weeks, months or in some cases even years depending on the nature of the concerns. Studies confirming existing research will likely take less time to review than those breaking new ground. The board may consult with study authors about wording, methodology, and findings and has broad gatekeeping authority to reject studies outright.

Publication acceptance rates vary. Prestigious journals may have a very low acceptance rate due to submission volume while a niche journal may have fewer submissions and a higher acceptance rate.

Publication of inaccurate, misleading, ethically compromised or fraudulent medical studies can damage a journal’s reputation and cause confusion in the medical field.

Limitations of Peer Review

Lack of Consistency Between Journals

In addition to universal basic research standards, medical journals may apply their own particular additional standards. For instance, a scientifically valid study could be rejected because the journal dislikes the format or the way methods were applied. Journals are not a homogenous group. A study rejected by one may be later published by another.

Human Limitations

Despite their expertise, peer reviewers are still human and may overlook important concerns or otherwise make mistakes. Their objectivity could become compromised by the prominence of the researchers, the journal’s need for material, or because a discovery could potentially enhance the journal’s reputation.

Other potential influences:

  • institutional affiliation of reviewers and/or researchers
  • bias based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation and other aspects of personal identity
  • different opinions regarding statistical analysis and other research parameters

Commercial Interests

Drug companies, medical device makers and other private entities may submit distorted studies that support their products.

By MedTruth Editors




MedTruth is a digital magazine reporting on health, safety and justice. Join the revolution today at

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

Batteries in Montreal vs Mexico.

The Global Grand Challenge of Our Time

Subliminal Product Placement in movies (study)

Why was the Nobel Prize awarded for Nitric Oxide? -

Post-Launch Expectations

The Wave Function

The Birth of a Universe — The Volcanic Planet Reveal

Asean-SAN- making science central to policy-making

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store


MedTruth is a digital magazine reporting on health, safety and justice. Join the revolution today at

More from Medium

What Data Tells Us

Fairness in Machine Learning

Chocolate Reviews: An Analysis of Factors That Make Chocolate Enjoyable

The Power of Purpose in a pandemic