DuPont Avoids PFAS Lawsuit in New York

A federal judge in New York has dismissed a lawsuit by Suez Water New York, a water management company alleging that DuPont and its subsequent spinoffs are responsible for contaminating New York’s water supply with perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).

U.S. District Judge Lewis J. Liman dismissed the claims of Suez Water New York, calling their allegations general and sparse. Suez filed the lawsuits against DuPont, referred to in the lawsuit as “Old DuPont” as well as the “New DuPont” and its subsidiaries: Chemours and Corteva.

New DuPont and its subsidiaries were created after Old DuPont was restructured. Suez’s lawsuit alleges that the four companies had polluted New York’s water with PFAS for decades, and therefore Suez was owed the costs for upgrades to its five water treatment plants.

Suez claimed that New DuPont, Corteva, and Chemours were liable under the principle of successor jurisdiction, a legal concept that argues that companies that are created from an earlier company are still liable for all of the previous company’s liabilities. Suez Water New York argues that since Old DuPont was succeeded by New DuPont, Chemours, and Corteva, then those three successor companies are liable as well.

Judge Liman disagreed with that rationale, stating, “Because the limited circumstances where it is appropriate to recognize successor jurisdiction are not present in this case, the Court concludes that Corteva and New DuPont did not inherit Old DuPont’s jurisdictional status.”

Despite disagreeing with their jurisdictional arguments, Judge Liman did begrudgingly concede that the four companies named in the lawsuit did “barely” have enough presence to be sued in New York. Suez Water New York is claiming that the four companies have violated public nuisance law, private nuisance laws, and behaved negligently.

Despite the fact that New DuPont has escaped the claims of Suez Water New York in the Empire State, a different federal judge, U.S. District Judge Madeline Cox Arleo, allowed Suez’s claims to move past the dismissal stage. Judge Arleo dismissed the arguments of Corteva and New DuPont that Chemours was the only entity responsible for PFAS claims after the restructuring and has therefore ordered that jurisdictional discovery begin in order to settle the issue.

Since Suez’s New York case was dismissed without prejudice, Suez can attempt to file the lawsuit against DuPont and its spinoffs again with a more legally sound case that addresses Judge Liman’s claims of generality, sparseness, and insufficient jurisdiction.




MedTruth is a digital magazine reporting on health, safety and justice. Join the revolution today at

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

Yes, Sex Workers Have the Right to Say No, Too

My Cousin Vinny and the Constitution’s “Coddling of Criminals”

READ/DOWNLOAD$< Cases and Materials on the Death Penalty (American Casebook Series) FULL BOOK PDF &…

SCOTUS Poised to Overturn Roe/Casey in Unique Fashion

Supreme Court poised to overturn Roe v. Wade and Casey v. Planned Parenthood

Is the Arbery Investigation Being Botched?

Charles Albright: The Eyeball Killer

A person’s eye.

How “Defund the Police” Amplifies the Challenges Faced by the Children of Police Officers

Rape, Strangle, and Dump was Truckers MO | True Crime

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store


MedTruth is a digital magazine reporting on health, safety and justice. Join the revolution today at

More from Medium

MailChimp RSVP Button-0222

Larry Correia and Steve Diamond team up in a writing podcast that cuts through all the bad advice

How are urban farmers changing the world? S3#1 — Koenraad Depauw

On Bergson’s Plotinus Lectures